↓ Skip to main content

Optimized Lysis-Extraction Method Combined With IS6110-Amplification for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Paucibacillary Sputum Specimens

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimized Lysis-Extraction Method Combined With IS6110-Amplification for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Paucibacillary Sputum Specimens
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02224
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pratt Kolia-Diafouka, Sylvain Godreuil, Arnaud Bourdin, Severine Carrère-Kremer, Laurent Kremer, Philippe Van de Perre, Edouard Tuaillon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 22 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 24 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2018.
All research outputs
#13,390,339
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#10,007
of 25,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,201
of 341,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#326
of 686 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 686 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.