You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative Microbiome Signatures and Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Mouse, Rat, Non-human Primate, and Human Feces
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02897 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ravinder Nagpal, Shaohua Wang, Leah C. Solberg Woods, Osborne Seshie, Stephanie T. Chung, Carol A. Shively, Thomas C. Register, Suzanne Craft, Donald A. McClain, Hariom Yadav |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 274 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 12% |
| Researcher | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 14% |
| Unknown | 84 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 47 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 20 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 46 | 17% |
| Unknown | 95 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,505,833
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#3,185
of 28,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,583
of 448,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#105
of 671 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 671 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.