↓ Skip to main content

Enterococcus faecalis Bacteriophage 156 Is an Effective Biotechnological Tool for Reducing the Presence of Tyramine and Putrescine in an Experimental Cheese Model

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enterococcus faecalis Bacteriophage 156 Is an Effective Biotechnological Tool for Reducing the Presence of Tyramine and Putrescine in an Experimental Cheese Model
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2019
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00566
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beatriz del Rio, Esther Sánchez-Llana, Begoña Redruello, Alfonso H. Magadan, María Fernández, Maria Cruz Martin, Victor Ladero, Miguel A. Alvarez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Professor 3 6%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 16 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Mathematics 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 25 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,850,519
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,689
of 29,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,913
of 365,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#245
of 674 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 674 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.