↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the Effect of QIIME Balanced Default Parameters on Metataxonomic Analysis Workflows With a Mock Community

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating the Effect of QIIME Balanced Default Parameters on Metataxonomic Analysis Workflows With a Mock Community
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2019
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01084
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimitrios Kioroglou, Albert Mas, Maria del Carmen Portillo

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 30%
Environmental Science 3 7%
Computer Science 3 7%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2019.
All research outputs
#13,295,153
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#9,813
of 25,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,125
of 351,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#278
of 624 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 624 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.