The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Zika Virus Induced More Severe Inflammatory Response Than Dengue Virus in Chicken Embryonic Livers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01127 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zongyi Zhang, Menghan Sun, Jieping Deng, Jianhai Yu, Xuesong Yang, Wei Zhao, Guobing Chen, Pengcheng Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 19% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2020.
All research outputs
#14,452,040
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#12,641
of 25,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,425
of 350,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#324
of 623 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 623 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.