The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolutionary Implications of Anoxygenic Phototrophy in the Bacterial Phylum Candidatus Eremiobacterota (WPS-2)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01658 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lewis M. Ward, Tanai Cardona, Hannah Holland-Moritz |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 22% |
| Researcher | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,490,514
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2,057
of 25,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,102
of 346,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#62
of 661 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 661 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.