↓ Skip to main content

Non-ribosomal Peptide Synthetase Gene Clusters in the Human Pathogenic Fungus Scedosporium apiospermum

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-ribosomal Peptide Synthetase Gene Clusters in the Human Pathogenic Fungus Scedosporium apiospermum
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2019
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02062
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yohann Le Govic, Nicolas Papon, Solène Le Gal, Jean-Philippe Bouchara, Patrick Vandeputte

Abstract

Scedosporium species are opportunistic fungi which preferentially affect patients with underlying conditions such as immunosuppression or cystic fibrosis (CF). While being the second most common molds capable to chronically colonize the CF lungs, the natural history of infection remains unclear. In filamentous fungi, a broad range of important secondary metabolites that are recognized as virulence factors are produced by multidomain non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs). The aim of this study was to provide a global in silico analysis of NRPS-encoding genes based on the recently sequenced Scedosporium apiospermum genome. We uncovered a total of nine NRPS genes, of which six exhibited sufficient similarity scores with other fungal NRPSs to predict the class of the generated peptide: siderophores (n = 2), epidithiodioxopiperazines (n = 2), and cyclopeptides (n = 2). Phylogenetic trees based on the multiple alignments of adenylation (A) domain sequences corroborated these findings. Nevertheless, substrate prediction methods for NRPS A-domains tended to fail, thus questioning about the exact nature of the peptide produced. Further studies should be undertaken since NRPSs, which are not synthesized by human cells, could represent attractive therapeutic targets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Master 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 40 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Chemistry 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 46 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,254,904
of 25,145,981 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,350
of 28,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,041
of 346,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#190
of 693 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,145,981 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 693 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.