↓ Skip to main content

Multiplexed Knockouts in the Model Diatom Phaeodactylum by Episomal Delivery of a Selectable Cas9

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiplexed Knockouts in the Model Diatom Phaeodactylum by Episomal Delivery of a Selectable Cas9
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2020
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Andrew Moosburner, Pardis Gholami, James K. McCarthy, Maxine Tan, Vincent A. Bielinski, Andrew E. Allen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 21 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 18%
Unspecified 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 23 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#14,469
of 29,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,724
of 480,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#371
of 664 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 664 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.