Emanuella Meneses Venceslau, José Paulo Siqueira Guida, Guilherme de Moraes Nobrega, Ana Paula Samogim, Pierina Lorencini Parise, Rodolfo Rosa Japecanga, Daniel Augusto de Toledo-Teixeira, Julia Forato, Arthur Antolini-Tavares, Arethusa Souza, Albina Altemani, Silvio Roberto Consonni, Renato Passini, Eliana Amaral, Jose Luiz Proenca-Modena, Maria Laura Costa, The Zika-Unicamp Network, John D. Horowitz, Glaucia Maria Pastore, Helaine Maria Besteti Pires Mayer-Milanez, Carolina C. Ribeiro-do-Valle, Roseli Calil, João Renato Bennini, Giuliane Jesus Lajos, Maria Luiza Moretti, Mariangela Ribeiro Resende, Márcia Teixeira Garcia, Rodrigo Nogueira Angerami, Kleber Yotsumoto Fertrin, Marcos Tadeu Nolasco da Silva, Ana Carolina Coan, Santos Maria Francisca Colella, Andrea Paula Bruno von Zuben, André Ricardo Ribas Freitas, Marco Aurélio Ramirez Vinolo, Rodrigo Ramos Catharino, Fábio Trindade Maranhão Costa, Clarice Weis Arns, Matheus Martini, é vellyn Ribeiro de Morais
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#603,365
of 26,735,240 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#337
of 30,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,799
of 389,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#5
of 750 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,735,240 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 750 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
