You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Australia: A Continent Without Native Powdery Mildews? The First Comprehensive Catalog Indicates Recent Introductions and Multiple Host Range Expansion Events, and Leads to the Re-discovery of Salmonomyces as a New Lineage of the Erysiphales
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01571 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Levente Kiss, Niloofar Vaghefi, Kaylene Bransgrove, John D. W. Dearnaley, Susumu Takamatsu, Yu Pei Tan, Craig Marston, Shu-Yan Liu, Dan-Ni Jin, Dante L. Adorada, Jordan Bailey, Maria Graciela Cabrera de Álvarez, Andrew Daly, Pamela Maia Dirchwolf, Lynne Jones, Thuan Dat Nguyen, Jacqueline Edwards, Wellcome Ho, Lisa Kelly, Sharl J. L. Mintoff, Jennifer Morrison, Márk Z. Németh, Sandy Perkins, Roger G. Shivas, Reannon Smith, Kara Stuart, Ronald Southwell, Unaisi Turaganivalu, Kálmán Zoltán Váczy, Annie Van Blommestein, Dominie Wright, Anthony Young, Uwe Braun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 8 | 26% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 6% |
| India | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Uganda | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 48% |
| Scientists | 14 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,708,387
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,098
of 29,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,404
of 429,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#39
of 962 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 962 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.