The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Combined Prophylactic and Therapeutic Use Maximizes Hydroxychloroquine Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Effects in vitro
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01704 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicola Clementi, Elena Criscuolo, Roberta Antonia Diotti, Roberto Ferrarese, Matteo Castelli, Lorenzo Dagna, Roberto Burioni, Massimo Clementi, Nicasio Mancini |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 10% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 184 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 21% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 85 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 26 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 88 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,849,139
of 26,277,952 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2,228
of 30,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,873
of 433,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#81
of 971 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,277,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 971 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.