The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 108 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gut Microbiomes Differ Among Dietary Types and Stool Consistency in the Captive Red Wolf (Canis rufus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2020.590212 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Morgan Bragg, Elizabeth W. Freeman, Haw Chuan Lim, Nucharin Songsasen, Carly R. Muletz-Wolz |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 78 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 96 | 89% |
| Scientists | 9 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 25% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#458,027
of 26,586,231 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#247
of 30,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,110
of 440,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7
of 928 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,586,231 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 928 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.