The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Soil Bacterial and Archaeal Communities and Their Potential to Perform N-Cycling Processes in Soils of Boreal Forests Growing on Well-Drained Peat
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2020.591358 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marika Truu, Hiie Nõlvak, Ivika Ostonen, Kristjan Oopkaup, Martin Maddison, Teele Ligi, Mikk Espenberg, Veiko Uri, Ülo Mander, Jaak Truu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Estonia | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,280,821
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#6,129
of 25,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,733
of 509,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#194
of 970 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 970 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.