↓ Skip to main content

Phytocompounds vs. Dental Plaque Bacteria: In vitro Effects of Myrtle and Pomegranate Polyphenolic Extracts Against Single-Species and Multispecies Oral Biofilms

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phytocompounds vs. Dental Plaque Bacteria: In vitro Effects of Myrtle and Pomegranate Polyphenolic Extracts Against Single-Species and Multispecies Oral Biofilms
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2020
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2020.592265
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Sateriale, Roberta Imperatore, Roberta Colicchio, Chiara Pagliuca, Ettore Varricchio, Maria Grazia Volpe, Paola Salvatore, Marina Paolucci, Caterina Pagliarulo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 19 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 20 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2020.
All research outputs
#18,102,444
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#17,642
of 25,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,345
of 420,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#690
of 937 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 937 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.