↓ Skip to main content

Biological Management of Banana Fusarium Wilt Caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense Tropical Race 4 Using Antagonistic Fungal Isolate CSR-T-3 (Trichoderma reesei)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biological Management of Banana Fusarium Wilt Caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense Tropical Race 4 Using Antagonistic Fungal Isolate CSR-T-3 (Trichoderma reesei)
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2020.595845
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thukkaram Damodaran, Shailendra Rajan, Manoharan Muthukumar, Ram Gopal, Kavita Yadav, Sandeep Kumar, Israr Ahmad, Nidhi Kumari, Vinay K. Mishra, Sunil K. Jha

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 43 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 41 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#13,651,377
of 23,270,775 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#10,611
of 25,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,315
of 506,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#366
of 938 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,270,775 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 938 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.