The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of a Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay to Detect Carbapenemases Directly From Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Spiked With Acinetobacter spp.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2020.597684 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Javier Moreno-Morales, Andrea Vergara, Tomislav Kostyanev, Jesús Rodriguez-Baño, Herman Goossens, Jordi Vila |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Australia | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2021.
All research outputs
#16,099,039
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#14,676
of 29,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,124
of 523,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#484
of 952 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 523,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 952 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.