The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolutionary Dynamics and Dissemination Pattern of the SARS-CoV-2 Lineage B.1.1.33 During the Early Pandemic Phase in Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2020.615280 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paola Cristina Resende, Edson Delatorre, Tiago Gräf, Daiana Mir, Fernando Couto Motta, Luciana Reis Appolinario, Anna Carolina Dias da Paixão, Ana Carolina da Fonseca Mendonça, Maria Ogrzewalska, Braulia Caetano, Gabriel Luz Wallau, Cássia Docena, Mirleide Cordeiro dos Santos, Jessylene de Almeida Ferreira, Edivaldo Costa Sousa, Sandro Patroca da Silva, Sandra Bianchini Fernandes, Lucas Alves Vianna, Larissa da Costa Souza, Jean F. G. Ferro, Vanessa B. Nardy, Cliomar A. Santos, Irina Riediger, Maria do Carmo Debur, Júlio Croda, Wanderson K. Oliveira, André Abreu, Gonzalo Bello, Marilda M. Siqueira |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 10 | 30% |
| Japan | 3 | 9% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 3% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 67% |
| Scientists | 9 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 34 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,815,069
of 26,549,961 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,157
of 30,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,125
of 461,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#49
of 962 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,549,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 962 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.