↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Dynamic nature of SecA and Its associated proteins in Escherichia coli

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Dynamic nature of SecA and Its associated proteins in Escherichia coli
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2020.634250
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shun Adachi, Yasuhiro Murakawa, Sota Hiraga

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2021.
All research outputs
#18,784,311
of 23,277,141 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#19,880
of 25,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,216
of 505,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#791
of 963 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,277,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 963 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.