↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Two 16S rRNA Primers (V3–V4 and V4–V5) for Studies of Arctic Microbial Communities

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Two 16S rRNA Primers (V3–V4 and V4–V5) for Studies of Arctic Microbial Communities
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2021.637526
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eduard Fadeev, Magda G. Cardozo-Mino, Josephine Z. Rapp, Christina Bienhold, Ian Salter, Verena Salman-Carvalho, Massimiliano Molari, Halina E. Tegetmeyer, Pier Luigi Buttigieg, Antje Boetius

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 288 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 17%
Student > Master 40 14%
Researcher 39 14%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 2%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 109 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 18%
Environmental Science 26 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 6%
Computer Science 4 1%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 115 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,354,902
of 26,168,182 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#5,022
of 30,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,955
of 460,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#163
of 962 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,168,182 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 962 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.