The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recurrent Dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 Through the Uruguayan–Brazilian Border
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2021.653986 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daiana Mir, Natalia Rego, Paola Cristina Resende, Fernando Tort, Tamara Fernández-Calero, Verónica Noya, Mariana Brandes, Tania Possi, Mailen Arleo, Natalia Reyes, Matías Victoria, Andres Lizasoain, Matías Castells, Leticia Maya, Matías Salvo, Tatiana Schäffer Gregianini, Marilda Tereza Mar da Rosa, Letícia Garay Martins, Cecilia Alonso, Yasser Vega, Cecilia Salazar, Ignacio Ferrés, Pablo Smircich, Jose Sotelo Silveira, Rafael Sebastián Fort, Cecilia Mathó, Ighor Arantes, Luciana Appolinario, Ana Carolina Mendonça, María José Benítez-Galeano, Camila Simoes, Martín Graña, Fernando Motta, Marilda Mendonça Siqueira, Gonzalo Bello, Rodney Colina, Lucía Spangenberg |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 26% |
| Professor | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2021.
All research outputs
#22,823,736
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#27,001
of 29,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#394,973
of 460,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,032
of 1,044 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,044 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.