The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nutrient-Poor Breeding Substrates of Ambrosia Beetles Are Enriched With Biologically Important Elements
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2021.664542 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maximilian Lehenberger, Nina Foh, Axel Göttlein, Diana Six, Peter H. W. Biedermann |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Poland | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 5 | 42% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,639,644
of 26,544,375 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#5,380
of 30,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,925
of 459,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#158
of 922 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,544,375 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 922 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.