The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Efficacy of Phage Therapy in a Murine Model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia and Sepsis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2021.682255 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xu Yang, Anwarul Haque, Shigenobu Matsuzaki, Tetsuya Matsumoto, Shigeki Nakamura |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 40% |
| Austria | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 33 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2021.
All research outputs
#13,672,601
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#10,634
of 25,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,342
of 439,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#447
of 1,166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.