↓ Skip to main content

Autophagy Induced by the N-Terminus of the Classic Swine Fever Virus Nonstructural Protein 5A Protein Promotes Viral Replication

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Autophagy Induced by the N-Terminus of the Classic Swine Fever Virus Nonstructural Protein 5A Protein Promotes Viral Replication
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2021.733385
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chengcheng Zhang, Xiuling Wang, Jiahao Sun, Mengjiao Guo, Xiaorong Zhang, Yantao Wu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2021.
All research outputs
#20,003,838
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#20,521
of 29,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,454
of 434,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#807
of 1,099 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,099 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.