↓ Skip to main content

Differential Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection and Active Tuberculosis: A Key to a Successful Tuberculosis Control Strategy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection and Active Tuberculosis: A Key to a Successful Tuberculosis Control Strategy
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, October 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2021.745592
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenping Gong, Xueqiong Wu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 183 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Student > Master 10 5%
Student > Bachelor 9 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 5%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 107 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 111 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#18,145,205
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#17,696
of 25,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,871
of 439,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#807
of 1,129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.