↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of PET Degradation Using Artificial Microbial Consortia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of PET Degradation Using Artificial Microbial Consortia
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2021.778828
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinhua Qi, Yuan Ma, Hanchen Chang, Bingzhi Li, Mingzhu Ding, Yingjin Yuan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 131 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Researcher 8 6%
Student > Master 6 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 68 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 5%
Chemical Engineering 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 72 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,805,175
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#6,920
of 24,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,975
of 498,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#177
of 1,003 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 498,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,003 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.