The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The structure and assembly of rhizobacterial communities are influenced by poplar genotype
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1052567 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Qi Liang Zhu, Kun Yan, Nian Zhao Wang, Shu Qi, De Shan Lu, Xiao Hua Su, Zheng Sai Yuan, Yu Feng Dong, Yan Ping Wang, Chang Jun Ding |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 17% |
Researcher | 1 | 17% |
Other | 1 | 17% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 33% |
Computer Science | 1 | 17% |
Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,754,533
of 23,572,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#8,534
of 26,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,565
of 452,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#188
of 1,185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,572,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.