The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Detection of FeChPV in a cat shelter outbreak of upper respiratory tract disease in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1064747 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiangqi Hao, Yanchao Li, Bo Chen, Hanhong Wang, Xinrui Wang, Xiangyu Xiao, Pei Zhou, Shoujun Li |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,577,479
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#8,958
of 29,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,510
of 486,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#188
of 1,170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 486,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.