The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In vitro Evaluation of Antiviral Efficacy of a Standardized Hydroalcoholic Extract of Poplar Type Propolis Against SARS-CoV-2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2022.799546 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giuseppe Sberna, Marco Biagi, Giovanni Marafini, Roberta Nardacci, Mirella Biava, Francesca Colavita, Pierluca Piselli, Elisabetta Miraldi, Gianpiero D’Offizi, Maria Rosaria Capobianchi, Alessandra Amendola |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,988,807
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#6,671
of 29,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,490
of 447,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#194
of 1,295 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,295 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.