The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Discovery of Tick-Borne Karshi Virus Implies Misinterpretation of the Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Seroprevalence in Northwest China
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2022.872067 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuan Bai, Yanfang Zhang, Zhengyuan Su, Shuang Tang, Jun Wang, Qiaoli Wu, Juan Yang, Abulimiti Moming, Yujiang Zhang, Lesley Bell-Sakyi, Surong Sun, Shu Shen, Fei Deng |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 22% |
Other | 2 | 22% |
Researcher | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,130,850
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#638
of 29,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,031
of 446,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#15
of 1,360 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,360 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.