The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Microbial mats as model to decipher climate change effect on microbial communities through a mesocosm study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1039658 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
C. Mazière, R. Duran, C. Dupuy, C. Cravo-Laureau |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,016,922
of 23,870,007 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#5,636
of 26,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,070
of 190,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#40
of 465 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,870,007 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 465 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.