↓ Skip to main content

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of infection with human T-lymphotropic virus in a non-endemic area: a single institution study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of infection with human T-lymphotropic virus in a non-endemic area: a single institution study
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2023
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1187697
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margery Gang, Feng Gao, Sneha Poondru, Theodore Thomas, Lee Ratner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#16,775,211
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#16,554
of 29,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,221
of 378,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#497
of 977 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 977 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.