You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: New perspectives on an old grouping: the genomic and phenotypic variability of Oxalobacter formigenes and the implications for calcium oxalate stone prevention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1231746 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John A. Chmiel, Charles Carr, Gerrit A. Stuivenberg, Robertson Venema, Ryan M. Chanyi, Kait F. Al, Daniel Giguere, Henry Say, Polycronis P. Akouris, Sergio Ari Domínguez Romero, Aaron Kwong, Vera Tai, Susan F. Koval, Hassan Razvi, Jennifer Bjazevic, Jeremy P. Burton |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2024.
All research outputs
#8,965,821
of 26,438,498 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#9,569
of 30,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,042
of 393,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#173
of 978 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,438,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 978 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.