The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Isolation of starch and protein degrading strain Bacillus subtilis FYZ1-3 from tobacco waste and genomic analysis of its tolerance to nicotine and inhibition of fungal growth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1260149 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Changwen Ye, Dandan Liu, Kuo Huang, Dong Li, Xinxin Ma, Yiying Jin, Hanguo Xiong |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Kenya | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2023.
All research outputs
#17,745,102
of 26,011,622 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#18,114
of 30,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,736
of 347,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#421
of 846 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,011,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,082 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 846 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.