The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness assessment of using water environmental microHI to predict the health status of wild fish
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1293342 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haile Yang, Jia Zhong, Xiaoqian Leng, Jinming Wu, Peilin Cheng, Li Shen, Jinping Wu, Pengcheng Li, Hao Du |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,075,512
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#19,579
of 29,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,257
of 342,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#371
of 809 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 809 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.