The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early fecal microbiota transplantation from high abdominal fat chickens affects recipient cecal microbiome and metabolism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1332230 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiani Song, Chaowei Luo, Zhijie Liu, Jingshou Liu, Li Xie, Xing Zhang, Zhuojun Xie, Xiangkun Li, Zheng Ma, Jinlong Ding, Hua Li, Hai Xiang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,523,843
of 25,223,158 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#22,742
of 28,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,186
of 218,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#324
of 506 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,223,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 506 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.