The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of ruminal microbiota, IL-1β gene variation, and tick incidence between Holstein × Gyr and Holstein heifers in grazing system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1132151 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daiana Francisca Quirino, Marcos Inácio Marcondes, Kellen Ribeiro de Oliveira, Simone Elisa Facioni Guimarães, Juliana Soares da Silva, Garret Suen, Letícia Elisa Rossi, Camila Soares Cunha, Hilario Cuquetto Mantovani, Polyana Pizzi Rotta |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#22,753,129
of 25,364,936 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#26,902
of 29,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,980
of 144,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#386
of 390 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 390 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.