The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Benefit analysis of the auto-verification system of intelligent inspection for microorganisms
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1334897 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yu-Hsiang Ou, Yung-Ta Chang, Ding-Ping Chen, Chun-Wei Chuang, Kuo-Chien Tsao, Chiu-Hsiang Wu, An-Jing Kuo, Huey-Ling You, Chung-Guei Huang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#22,887,139
of 25,519,924 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#24,482
of 29,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,226
of 153,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#248
of 426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,519,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.