The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comprehensive genome sequence analysis of Ralstonia solanacearum gd-2, a phylotype I sequevar 15 strain collected from a tobacco bacterial phytopathogen
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1335081 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhiliang Xiao, Guangcan Li, Aiguo Yang, Zhengwen Liu, Min Ren, Lirui Cheng, Dan Liu, Caihong Jiang, Liuying Wen, Shengxin Wu, Yazhi Cheng, Wen Yu, Ruimei Geng |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philippines | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,046,488
of 25,505,015 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#19,563
of 29,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,646
of 170,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#175
of 462 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,505,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 462 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.