The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Practice of standardization of CLSI M45 A3 antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria strains isolated from blood specimens in Guangdong Province 2017–2021
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1335169 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nanhao He, Xu Yang, Anwarul Haque, Jiakang Chen, Yingyi Guo, Jiahui Li, Likang Yao, Chuyue Zhuo, Jiong Wang, Yijing Wang, Mingxin Li, Yexin Lin, Shunian Xiao, Chao Zhuo |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
India | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,353,982
of 25,815,269 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#11,879
of 29,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,616
of 147,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#40
of 376 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,815,269 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 376 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.