↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: The role of commensal microbiota in drug metabolism: friend or foe?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: The role of commensal microbiota in drug metabolism: friend or foe?
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1364747
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing-Hua Wang, Dong-Woo Lim, Mukesh Kumar Yadav, Xiao Zheng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#16,099,039
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#14,676
of 29,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,057
of 282,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#175
of 676 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 676 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.