The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
MAGs-centric crack: how long will, spore-positive Frankia and most Protofrankia, microsymbionts remain recalcitrant to axenic growth?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1367490 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maher Gtari, Radhi Maaoui, Faten Ghodhbane-Gtari, Karim Ben Slama, Imed Sbissi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2024.
All research outputs
#18,043,847
of 26,404,318 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#18,210
of 30,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,892
of 139,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#41
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,404,318 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.