The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Deorphanizing solute carriers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for secondary uptake of xenobiotic compounds
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1376653 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Iben Møller-Hansen, Javier Sáez-Sáez, Steven A. van der Hoek, Jane D. Dyekjær, Hanne B. Christensen, Marina Wright Muelas, Steve O’Hagan, Douglas B. Kell, Irina Borodina |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,977,451
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#15,732
of 29,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,001
of 173,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#109
of 454 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 454 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.