The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: Functional metagenomic and metabolomics analysis of gut dysbiosis induced by hyperoxia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1382290 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yulan Cai, Yanhong Luo, Ninan Dai, Yan Yang, Ying He, Huajun Chen, Manlu Zhao, Xiaoyun Fu, Tao Chen, Zhouxiong Xing |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2024.
All research outputs
#17,298,896
of 25,394,081 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#18,075
of 29,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,805
of 197,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#197
of 557 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,081 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 557 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.