The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Microbial signatures in human periodontal disease: a metatranscriptome meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1383404 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Armen Ovsepian, Filippos S. Kardaras, Anargyros Skoulakis, Artemis G. Hatzigeorgiou |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 50% |
Researcher | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 2 | 50% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,740,846
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#6,236
of 29,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,832
of 222,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#21
of 550 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 550 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.