The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consistent prokaryotic community patterns along the radial root axis of two Zea mays L. landraces across two distinct field locations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1386476 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicolas Tyborski, Tina Koehler, Franziska A. Steiner, Shu-Yin Tung, Andreas J. Wild, Andrea Carminati, Carsten W. Mueller, Alix Vidal, Sebastian Wolfrum, Johanna Pausch, Tillmann Lueders |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 80% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2024.
All research outputs
#8,667,272
of 26,387,248 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#8,903
of 30,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,852
of 169,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#23
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,387,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.