↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence, diversity and applications potential of nodules endophytic bacteria: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence, diversity and applications potential of nodules endophytic bacteria: a systematic review
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1386742
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohamed Hnini, Jamal Aurag

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#16,558,805
of 26,119,990 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#14,362
of 30,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,930
of 245,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#105
of 493 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,119,990 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 493 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.