The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The interplay between the microbiota and opioid in the treatment of neuropathic pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1390046 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zexiong Gong, Qingsheng Xue, Yan Luo, Buwei Yu, Bo Hua, Zhiheng Liu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 50% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,059,458
of 26,246,850 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4,916
of 30,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,129
of 231,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#13
of 320 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,246,850 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 320 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.