The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Budding and explosive membrane vesicle production by hypervesiculating Escherichia coli strain ΔrodZ
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1400434 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yoshihiro Ojima, Kaho Toda, Tomomi Sawabe, Yuki Kumazoe, Yuhei O. Tahara, Makoto Miyata, Masayuki Azuma |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2024.
All research outputs
#17,301,438
of 26,175,267 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#15,877
of 30,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,619
of 158,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#50
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,175,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.