The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bariatric-induced microbiome changes alter MASLD development in association with changes in the innate immune system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1407555 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simer Shera, William Katzka, Julianne C. Yang, Candace Chang, Nerea Arias-Jayo, Venu Lagishetty, Anna Balioukova, Yijun Chen, Erik Dutson, Zhaoping Li, Emeran A. Mayer, Joseph R. Pisegna, Claudia Sanmiguel, Shrey Pawar, David Zhang, Madelaine Leitman, Laura Hernandez, Jonathan P. Jacobs, Tien S. Dong |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2024.
All research outputs
#21,577,186
of 26,488,660 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#22,386
of 30,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,315
of 159,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#85
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,488,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.