The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing microbial populations from diverse hydrothermal features in Yellowstone National Park: hot springs and mud volcanoes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1409664 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Rowe, Scot E. Dowd, Kelly Davidson, Claire Kovarik, Michayla VanAken, Alyssa Jarabek, Churro Taylor |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2024.
All research outputs
#21,509,553
of 26,386,754 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#22,311
of 30,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,341
of 231,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#125
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,386,754 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.